Black Tea party Patriots in action. Racist? No! Patriots? Yes! Balls? You betchya!
You can't stop the signal! (Blatently stolen from The real King of France.)
Showing posts with label Liberty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberty. Show all posts
August 6, 2010
August 2, 2010
You can't stop the signal.
As a SciFi fan I am reminded of the line in Serenity. This document, Disco and Atomic War, is about growing up in Estonia, and the effect of Finish television in the former Soviet Union. The full movie can be seen below but only for a limited time. I highly recommend watching.
I have a sneaky feeling history will prove that cell phone video and YouTube will have the same effect in this country. "You can't stop the signal".
I have a sneaky feeling history will prove that cell phone video and YouTube will have the same effect in this country. "You can't stop the signal".
July 28, 2010
July 21, 2010
Liberal Racism
Original story: Liberal Racism
This is a great piece by Allen West who is running for the as seat in Florida's 22nd Congressional district. It's renews my faith in my country to see men of strong moral character standing up and saying what needs to said. Buy the way, he doesnt look angry or ..... ra... never mind. I encourage supporting him.
Juicy Snippets:
"It is this duplicitous hypocrisy which allows me to state that the NAACP is shamefully now a liberal racist enabler. The upcoming mid-term elections have the Democrat party in certain peril. Therefore they have turned to their tactic of first and last resort, race baiting.
The resolution issued by the NAACP against the Tea Party is just a strategy to focus this coming election not against liberal progressive policies, which are anathema to our Republic. No, the NAACP, in conjunction with their masters, the Democrat party, seek to make this into an election based upon an insane charge of racial hatred."
"I find the Tea Party, to which I have spoken to several times, stands for fundamental principles and values consistent with that which has made America an exceptional Constitutional Republic.
Therefore, under the "leadership" of Al Sharpton, this counter group One Nation obviously stands for principles which are antithetical to our Republic."
"antithetical to our Republic" Mr. West is definitely polite. I would have used much stronger language. BTW: I like your shirt Allen!
This is a great piece by Allen West who is running for the as seat in Florida's 22nd Congressional district. It's renews my faith in my country to see men of strong moral character standing up and saying what needs to said. Buy the way, he doesnt look angry or ..... ra... never mind. I encourage supporting him.
Juicy Snippets:
"It is this duplicitous hypocrisy which allows me to state that the NAACP is shamefully now a liberal racist enabler. The upcoming mid-term elections have the Democrat party in certain peril. Therefore they have turned to their tactic of first and last resort, race baiting.
The resolution issued by the NAACP against the Tea Party is just a strategy to focus this coming election not against liberal progressive policies, which are anathema to our Republic. No, the NAACP, in conjunction with their masters, the Democrat party, seek to make this into an election based upon an insane charge of racial hatred."
"I find the Tea Party, to which I have spoken to several times, stands for fundamental principles and values consistent with that which has made America an exceptional Constitutional Republic.
Therefore, under the "leadership" of Al Sharpton, this counter group One Nation obviously stands for principles which are antithetical to our Republic."
"antithetical to our Republic" Mr. West is definitely polite. I would have used much stronger language. BTW: I like your shirt Allen!
July 3, 2010
Independence Day Reflections
Happy Independence day. Mostly.... On this fourth of July weekend I would like to reflect on just what the declaration of independence meant, what it means today, and compare the first hundred and forty odd years years since the signing, and the years following. Our great nation was built on some very simple yet at the time, and even today, radical ideas.
Rights: First and foremost the declaration of independence affirmed that man has natural rights. Rights, not given to him by any worldly entity, but rights by simple reason of mans existence. Your natural and individual rights,"God given rights"are yours by virtue of your birth. No King, Government, nor any person gives you your rights. Ask yourself "Do I believe this?". If so are you willing to act accordingly?
Capitalism: The United States, from it's inception has grown and shortly led the world in Freedom, Prosperity, Wealth, Technology and Social Mobility for most of it's existence. Why? The answer is simple. Capitalism. Capitalism is the only means of wealth exchange that is moral and fair. (All others at some point wind up with the muzzle of a gun pointed at you) In the years prior to WWI , the American way of life could be defined as unfettered capitalism. Our nations growth was unmatched. Growth, and prosperity sored. The world looked at us with envy. What changed and why? Why do we not defend capitalism any more? Why do our "Conservatives" , politicians and laymen, dare not speak the word, much less defend it? True conservatism is to be a Capitalist, but many who call themselves conservatives, cite God, the Flag, Tradition and "Our Troops" but never speak of the true virtues of Capitalism. Why do "Conservatives" surrender this ground to the enemy unchallenged?
Freedom: Are we free today? Please discuss. Bueller?.......
Bueller?........
How about liberty?.....
Bueller?......................
Rights: First and foremost the declaration of independence affirmed that man has natural rights. Rights, not given to him by any worldly entity, but rights by simple reason of mans existence. Your natural and individual rights,"God given rights"are yours by virtue of your birth. No King, Government, nor any person gives you your rights. Ask yourself "Do I believe this?". If so are you willing to act accordingly?
Capitalism: The United States, from it's inception has grown and shortly led the world in Freedom, Prosperity, Wealth, Technology and Social Mobility for most of it's existence. Why? The answer is simple. Capitalism. Capitalism is the only means of wealth exchange that is moral and fair. (All others at some point wind up with the muzzle of a gun pointed at you) In the years prior to WWI , the American way of life could be defined as unfettered capitalism. Our nations growth was unmatched. Growth, and prosperity sored. The world looked at us with envy. What changed and why? Why do we not defend capitalism any more? Why do our "Conservatives" , politicians and laymen, dare not speak the word, much less defend it? True conservatism is to be a Capitalist, but many who call themselves conservatives, cite God, the Flag, Tradition and "Our Troops" but never speak of the true virtues of Capitalism. Why do "Conservatives" surrender this ground to the enemy unchallenged?
Freedom: Are we free today? Please discuss. Bueller?.......
Bueller?........
How about liberty?.....
Bueller?......................
June 28, 2010
Justices extend gun owner rights nationwide
Justices extend gun owner rights nationwide.
By MARK SHERMAN
The Associated Press
Monday, June 28, 2010; 10:46 AM
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court held Monday that the Constitution's Second Amendment restrains government's ability to significantly limit "the right to keep and bear arms," advancing a recent trend by the John Roberts-led bench to embrace gun rights.
By a narrow, 5-4 vote, the justices also signaled, however, that some limitations on the right could survive legal challenges.
Writing for the court in a case involving restrictive laws in Chicago and one of its suburbs, Justice Samuel Alito said that the Second Amendment right "applies equally to the federal government and the states."
The court was split along familiar ideological lines, with five conservative-moderate justices in favor of gun rights and four liberals opposed. Chief Justice Roberts voted with the majority.
Two years ago, the court declared that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess guns, at least for purposes of self-defense in the home.
That ruling applied only to federal laws. It struck down a ban on handguns and a trigger lock requirement for other guns in the District of Columbia, a federal city with a unique legal standing. At the same time, the court was careful not to cast doubt on other regulations of firearms here.
Gun rights proponents almost immediately filed a federal lawsuit challenging gun control laws in Chicago and its suburb of Oak Park, Ill, where handguns have been banned for nearly 30 years. The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence says those laws appear to be the last two remaining outright bans.
Lower federal courts upheld the two laws, noting that judges on those benches were bound by Supreme Court precedent and that it would be up to the high court justices to ultimately rule on the true reach of the Second Amendment.
The Supreme Court already has said that most of the guarantees in the Bill of Rights serve as a check on state and local, as well as federal, laws.
Monday's decision did not explicitly strike down the Chicago area laws, ordering a federal appeals court to reconsider its ruling. But it left little doubt that they would eventually fall.
Still, Alito noted that the declaration that the Second Amendment is fully binding on states and cities "limits (but by no means eliminates) their ability to devise solutions to social problems that suit local needs and values."
By MARK SHERMAN
The Associated Press
Monday, June 28, 2010; 10:46 AM
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court held Monday that the Constitution's Second Amendment restrains government's ability to significantly limit "the right to keep and bear arms," advancing a recent trend by the John Roberts-led bench to embrace gun rights.
By a narrow, 5-4 vote, the justices also signaled, however, that some limitations on the right could survive legal challenges.
Writing for the court in a case involving restrictive laws in Chicago and one of its suburbs, Justice Samuel Alito said that the Second Amendment right "applies equally to the federal government and the states."
The court was split along familiar ideological lines, with five conservative-moderate justices in favor of gun rights and four liberals opposed. Chief Justice Roberts voted with the majority.
Two years ago, the court declared that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess guns, at least for purposes of self-defense in the home.
That ruling applied only to federal laws. It struck down a ban on handguns and a trigger lock requirement for other guns in the District of Columbia, a federal city with a unique legal standing. At the same time, the court was careful not to cast doubt on other regulations of firearms here.
Gun rights proponents almost immediately filed a federal lawsuit challenging gun control laws in Chicago and its suburb of Oak Park, Ill, where handguns have been banned for nearly 30 years. The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence says those laws appear to be the last two remaining outright bans.
Lower federal courts upheld the two laws, noting that judges on those benches were bound by Supreme Court precedent and that it would be up to the high court justices to ultimately rule on the true reach of the Second Amendment.
The Supreme Court already has said that most of the guarantees in the Bill of Rights serve as a check on state and local, as well as federal, laws.
Monday's decision did not explicitly strike down the Chicago area laws, ordering a federal appeals court to reconsider its ruling. But it left little doubt that they would eventually fall.
Still, Alito noted that the declaration that the Second Amendment is fully binding on states and cities "limits (but by no means eliminates) their ability to devise solutions to social problems that suit local needs and values."
Your Right to Own a Gun. (FoxBusinessNetwork)
I was listening to Fox News on my XM radio the other day and happened to listen to John Stossel promoting this piece. What surprised me is during the promo interview John gave a quick background on himself. He stated that he is a former/recovering liberal who has developed libertarian view because he truly investigated issues and strives to be intellectually honest with himself and the world.
Related post: The gun is civilization
Related post: The gun is civilization
April 14, 2010
Army to court martial 'birther' officer. I say bring it on.
With just a little investigation this man appears to be the real deal. He wants a Court Martial!
Please visit and poke around http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/ and make up your own mind.
Update: Related link on WND NPR changes archive regarding president's birth Thanks to: http://cmblake6.wordpress.com/
Update: Related link on WND NPR changes archive regarding president's birth Thanks to: http://cmblake6.wordpress.com/
LTC Lakin's numerous awards and decorations include the Army Flight Surgeon Badge, Combat Medical Badge, the Bronze Star Medal, the Meritorious Service Medal, the Army Commendation Medal with two Oak Leaf Clusters, the Army Achievement Medal with one Oak Leaf Clusters, the National Defense Service Medal with Bronze Service Star, the Armed Forces Expedition Medal, the Army Reserve Component Achievement Medal, the Army Service Ribbon, the Overseas Service Ribbon sixth award and the NATO service medal. He has served previously in Honduras, Bosnia, El Salvador, Korea, and Afghanistan.
For well over a year, LTC Lakin has asked through his chain of command and his Congressional delegation for proof that President Obama is Constitutionally eligible to serve as his Commander-in-Chief. He has explained to his superiors that he cannot understand how his Oath of Office to protect and defend the Constitution does not allow military officers to pursue this proof of eligibility.
LTC Lakin received military orders in late February for deployment to Afghanistan, including a requirement that he provide "copies of his birth certificate." LTC Lakin is prepared to provide a certified copy of his certification of vital record that lists his birth hospital, physician's name and other key information. He has provided this document for many other required processes, such as his commissioning into the military as an officer, his security clearance and his marriage license. He is the highest ranking officer to go public over this controversy and the first active duty officer to do so.
el Clicky for Vid:
February 23, 2010
The Swiss, Guns, Genocide, and the right to defend oneself.
'Nuff Said.......
Labels:
Ayn,
Guns,
Liberty,
Truth and progressive consequences
February 17, 2010
Lockeing Up Leviathan
I came across this accidently while engaged in a philisopical debade with one of my freinds; Lockeing Up Leviathan . It is agreat artical by Jerry Salcido, and place it high on my recomended reading list. The comments are also outstanding.
"Without need of either advocating or rejecting Hobbes' arguments in favor of a strong State, one can hardly look upon modern governments, including the United States federal government and the individual United States, without agreeing that Hobbes' depiction of the State as a Leviathan, that is, a threatening, powerful beast, was spot-on.
Like any carnivorous beast, Leviathan has a ravenous appetite, but it differs in that its appetite is never satisfied and it has even been known to eat itself to death. Leviathan's only and favorite staple is, of course, taxes. "
"Without need of either advocating or rejecting Hobbes' arguments in favor of a strong State, one can hardly look upon modern governments, including the United States federal government and the individual United States, without agreeing that Hobbes' depiction of the State as a Leviathan, that is, a threatening, powerful beast, was spot-on.
Like any carnivorous beast, Leviathan has a ravenous appetite, but it differs in that its appetite is never satisfied and it has even been known to eat itself to death. Leviathan's only and favorite staple is, of course, taxes. "
January 12, 2010
Legalize the Constitution
I love how the Judge illustrates the absurdity of the interstate commerce clause, witch in my opinion is one of the most abused portions of our constitution.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






